The Spring of
1904 had a number of events occurring which overlapped and influenced each
other. The aging Lehigh Valley Railroad station was in need of replacement, and
the Railroad was wanting to change the name of the station to be more inviting
for arriving passengers. At the same time the Farmer village residents were
seeking to become incorporated, thereby giving them street lights and better
sidewalks and roadways.
To find a new
name for their station the Railroad asked for suggestions and offered that
if a new name could be selected, they would build a new station.
It is
interesting to look at the newspaper articles to see what was being said about
the incorporation, not very much. Official notices were placed for the petition
for incorporation, for the public hearing to discuss the issue and the election
notice. Only one article mentioned discussion, and that was reporting on a
debate held by the Bradford Debate Club. The article in the February 19, 1904
issue of the Farmer Review noted, “Last Friday evening was very pleasing
to all in attendance. Six young men debated the subject, “Farmer should be
incorporated,” and both sides of the question were well argued. The judges
awarded the decision to the affirmative side.”
March 4, 1904 Farmer Review:
Farmer Incorporated. The future destiny of Farmer was favorably decided on
Wednesday afternoon, March 2, 1904. One hundred and eighteen votes were cast—72
for and 48 against the proposition, making a majority of 26 in favor. The
election of officers will take place in due time, and some system of street
lighting arranged for. The roads and walks will be properly cared for, and we
are able to assure the Lehigh Valley railroad company that our village will try
and be as attractive as the new depot they propose to build here.
The new name for
the station went into effect on May 1, 1904. Later that month the Farmer
Review included a notice about the name changes and a bit of the paper’s
history.
Special Notice May 15 the Lehigh Valley
railroad company changed the name of their station at Farmer to Interlaken.
Postmaster F. H. Johnson, on Monday, received notice from the postmaster
general that the post office name will be changed to Interlaken at the
beginning of the next quarter, on July 1, ’04. [1904]
This paper was started by the present
publisher on July 23, 1887, as the Saturday Morning Review. At the
solicitation of D.C. Wheeler and Rev. Lewis Halsey, the name was changed to the
Farmer Village Review, to incorporate the name of the village. When the
“Village” was dropped from the post office name, in 1892,
the word was also dropped from the paper’s name. At the end of the present
volume, July 23 next, we shall again change to keep pace with the onward
movement of our village, and will call it The Interlaken Review. Farmer
Review 5/27/1904 [As it happened, the Review changed its name with
the first issue in July, rather than waiting for later in the month.]
It should be
noted that the name change did not come without controversy. Even though the
Lehigh Valley Railroad had first offered the new depot in exchange for a new
name, and had awarded Georgiana Wheeler the honor of the name she had
suggested, there were still those who “asked them to reconsider their decision
to change the name of their station at Farmer to Interlaken, and, instead, call
it Creston.” Farmer Review article April 8, 1904
In the end, all
three, Station, Post Office and Village were called Interlaken. This was the
name suggested by Miss Wheeler, the local teacher, after she had spent time in
Interlaken Switzerland, and thought it fit well with our area.
The renaming of
Farmer to Interlaken was the main question on the March 21, 1905, ballot to
elect officers for the village. “The question: ‘Shall the incorporate name of
the village of Farmer be changed to the village of Interlaken,’ was the real
centre of interest at this election, the name of the post office, depot,
telegraph, express and telephone offices already having made that
change…seventy votes were cast.” When counted 47 said yes, 23 no and one was
blank. The article noted the change “takes effect immediately upon the filing
of the certificate of the vote,” which happened at 7:06 p.m. on March 21, 1905.
[Interlaken Review March 24, 1905]
As a side note,
I have yet to find any information on who or why the name of Creston was
proposed. What has been found were several poems on the question of
incorporation and name changes. One is shared here from the June 3, 1904 Interlaken Review.
Interlaken
Interlaken now,
you see
Farmer though,
we used to be;
But we’ve
enterprising grown,
And must reap as
we have sown.
Citizens when
they go away,
Will not be
bothered all the day,
By having
strangers asking how
It happens that
they follow the plow.
Electric lights and
sidewalks laid,
Every new
improvement made,
All are proud of
this new town
That has turned
old Farmer down.
We have left old
friends for new,
We have left old
Farmer true,
On the old we’ve
turned our backs,
For the new are
making tracks.
Farmer had to us
grown dear,
It was a friend
for many a year,
When long away
and homeward bound,
How sweet to us
the name would sound.
Of course the
name was very humble,
And we would be
the last to grumble,
But Farmer has a
back seat taken
For this
new-fangled Interlaken.
Two notes: the
new railroad station was not built until 1910, and that will be covered in June
as its own Snippet From the Past.
The Historical
Society is sometimes asked, “is the Farmers’ Museum on Main Street a museum for
the Village of Farmer?” The answer is no, it is a museum for the farmers and
the agrarian way of life of this area and all rural areas. Just the reverse of
the poem’s comment.
Dewitt’s Diary
March 2, 1954
Temperature 28
this morning. South west wind and broken clouds. One inch of snow.
Had a shooting
in the House of Rep in Washington yesterday. Five members wounded.
The United States Capitol shooting incident of 1954
was an attack on March 1, 1954, by four Puerto Rican nationalists; they shot 30
rounds from semi-automatic pistols from the Ladies' Gallery
(a balcony for visitors) of the House of Representatives chamber in the United
States Capitol. They wanted to highlight their desire for Puerto Rican independence
from US rule.
The nationalists, … began shooting at the 240 Representatives of
the 83rd Congress, who were debating an immigration bill. Five Representatives
were wounded, one seriously, but all recovered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Capitol_shooting_incident_(1954)
No comments:
Post a Comment